https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199801 A civil suit for arrears of pay was maintainable, because Crown immunity did not bar recovery of salary arrears in India. The court held that the employee was engaged and paid on civil terms at Rs. 150 per month on the basis of the governing records and correspondence, and a later unilateral reduction was unjustified for services already rendered. The discharge was nevertheless held lawful under the terms of engagement and the military administration's authority, so claims for damages, allowance differentials, and consequential compensation failed for lack of proof and legal basis. Relief was confined to higher basic pay, arrears, and interest. en-us Mon, 05 Apr 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:10:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199801 A civil suit for arrears of pay was maintainable, because Crown immunity did not bar recovery of salary arrears in India. The court held that the employee was engaged and paid on civil terms at Rs. 150 per month on the basis of the governing records and correspondence, and a later unilateral reduction was unjustified for services already rendered. The discharge was nevertheless held lawful under the terms of engagement and the military administration's authority, so claims for damages, allowance differentials, and consequential compensation failed for lack of proof and legal basis. Relief was confined to higher basic pay, arrears, and interest. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Apr 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199801