https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199792 Company officer liability under the Insecticides Act depends on the statutory basis invoked. For directors, vicarious prosecution could not stand because the complaint lacked foundational averments that they were in charge of, or responsible for, the company's business, and the proceedings were quashed. For the chemist, liability under the provision covering consent, connivance, or neglect required evidence of his role in the manufacturing process; that question was left for trial, so the proceedings were not quashed at the threshold. en-us Thu, 01 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:57:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199792 Company officer liability under the Insecticides Act depends on the statutory basis invoked. For directors, vicarious prosecution could not stand because the complaint lacked foundational averments that they were in charge of, or responsible for, the company's business, and the proceedings were quashed. For the chemist, liability under the provision covering consent, connivance, or neglect required evidence of his role in the manufacturing process; that question was left for trial, so the proceedings were not quashed at the threshold. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199792