https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199788 The agreement for sale was held to be true, valid, supported by consideration and enforceable by specific performance. The burden lay on the party resisting the prior contract to prove that the fifth defendant was a bona fide purchaser for value without notice, but the evidence showed he was informed of the agreement soon after execution and the registration record recorded an objection based on the subsisting contract. He therefore could not claim the protection available to a purchaser without notice, and the plaintiff's suit for specific performance succeeded. en-us Tue, 15 Feb 1949 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:02:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199788 The agreement for sale was held to be true, valid, supported by consideration and enforceable by specific performance. The burden lay on the party resisting the prior contract to prove that the fifth defendant was a bona fide purchaser for value without notice, but the evidence showed he was informed of the agreement soon after execution and the registration record recorded an objection based on the subsisting contract. He therefore could not claim the protection available to a purchaser without notice, and the plaintiff's suit for specific performance succeeded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Feb 1949 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199788