<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1286 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199786</link>
    <description>The Tribunal largely favored the assessee in the case, particularly regarding deductions under section 10A and the treatment of ESOP costs. The Tribunal provided detailed directions for each issue, often restoring matters to the AO for verification and recomputation based on established precedents and specific factual verifications. Notably, the Tribunal allowed the set-off of losses from 10A units against other income and directed the AO to verify and allow the ESOP cost claim based on subsequent years&#039; treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 07:35:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1286 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199786</link>
      <description>The Tribunal largely favored the assessee in the case, particularly regarding deductions under section 10A and the treatment of ESOP costs. The Tribunal provided detailed directions for each issue, often restoring matters to the AO for verification and recomputation based on established precedents and specific factual verifications. Notably, the Tribunal allowed the set-off of losses from 10A units against other income and directed the AO to verify and allow the ESOP cost claim based on subsequent years&#039; treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>