<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 535 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356832</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remanded the issue for fresh consideration, emphasizing that the deletion of penalty should be decided on a case-to-case basis, not solely based on the admission of an appeal in quantum proceedings. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, indicating that the issue required fresh consideration by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 07:30:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 535 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356832</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remanded the issue for fresh consideration, emphasizing that the deletion of penalty should be decided on a case-to-case basis, not solely based on the admission of an appeal in quantum proceedings. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, indicating that the issue required fresh consideration by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>