https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356830 The court refused to condone the 632-day delay in setting aside a self-operating order issued by the Prothonotary & Senior Master of the High Court, Bombay, directing removal of office objections within four weeks, failing which the Appeals would stand dismissed. The court emphasized the importance of diligence and responsibility in legal matters, highlighting the need for prompt compliance with court orders and providing adequate justifications for delays. The dismissal of the Notices of Motion seeking condonation underscores the court's stance on addressing delays in legal proceedings, especially in cases with significant tax implications. en-us Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Mar 2018 07:30:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356830 The court refused to condone the 632-day delay in setting aside a self-operating order issued by the Prothonotary & Senior Master of the High Court, Bombay, directing removal of office objections within four weeks, failing which the Appeals would stand dismissed. The court emphasized the importance of diligence and responsibility in legal matters, highlighting the need for prompt compliance with court orders and providing adequate justifications for delays. The dismissal of the Notices of Motion seeking condonation underscores the court's stance on addressing delays in legal proceedings, especially in cases with significant tax implications. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356830