<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 528 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356825</link>
    <description>The High Court granted early hearing and stay of the impugned order passed by the Tribunal in response to pending appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act. The Court admitted three appeals challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order for Assessment Years 1997-98, 1998-99, and 1999-2000, raising substantial questions of law on penalty imposition, exemption claims, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision legality. It examined the benefit of deduction under Section 10B for interest income, favoring the assessee based on a Karnataka High Court precedent. The Court also acknowledged prosecution against the applicant assessee and officers, ultimately granting a stay on the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 528 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356825</link>
      <description>The High Court granted early hearing and stay of the impugned order passed by the Tribunal in response to pending appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act. The Court admitted three appeals challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order for Assessment Years 1997-98, 1998-99, and 1999-2000, raising substantial questions of law on penalty imposition, exemption claims, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision legality. It examined the benefit of deduction under Section 10B for interest income, favoring the assessee based on a Karnataka High Court precedent. The Court also acknowledged prosecution against the applicant assessee and officers, ultimately granting a stay on the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>