<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 527 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356824</link>
    <description>The High Court extended the time for filing an appeal from the Assessment Order dated 29th December, 2017, and directed that recovery proceedings should not be initiated until the petitioners file an appeal by a specified date. The Court emphasized the availability of an alternative remedy through the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to address the petitioners&#039; concerns, ultimately disposing of the petition in line with these directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 07:29:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 527 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356824</link>
      <description>The High Court extended the time for filing an appeal from the Assessment Order dated 29th December, 2017, and directed that recovery proceedings should not be initiated until the petitioners file an appeal by a specified date. The Court emphasized the availability of an alternative remedy through the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to address the petitioners&#039; concerns, ultimately disposing of the petition in line with these directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>