<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 526 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356823</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the previous judgment and instructing the Tribunal to reevaluate the issues concerning various funds based on observations made in a Supreme Court judgment. The matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for fresh assessment, with specific directions regarding the treatment of the Cane Development Fund and further consideration of the Area Development Fund. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 18:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 526 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356823</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the previous judgment and instructing the Tribunal to reevaluate the issues concerning various funds based on observations made in a Supreme Court judgment. The matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for fresh assessment, with specific directions regarding the treatment of the Cane Development Fund and further consideration of the Area Development Fund. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>