<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 511 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356808</link>
    <description>Compensation ordered on conviction remains recoverable even after the accused has served the sentence in default of payment. The court applied the statutory scheme for recovery of fine and compensation, treating compensation as enforceable in the same manner, and relied on Supreme Court authority that default imprisonment does not discharge the liability. The petitioner therefore remained liable to pay the compensation amount, and the challenge to recovery failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 07:28:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 511 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356808</link>
      <description>Compensation ordered on conviction remains recoverable even after the accused has served the sentence in default of payment. The court applied the statutory scheme for recovery of fine and compensation, treating compensation as enforceable in the same manner, and relied on Supreme Court authority that default imprisonment does not discharge the liability. The petitioner therefore remained liable to pay the compensation amount, and the challenge to recovery failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>