https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356803 The Tribunal found that the appellant's actions, including reversing credit on common input services and paying full duty liability, complied with Rule 6 (3) (i) requirements for the period 2009-2010 to 2013-2014. The Tribunal held that the appellant should not be required to pay 5% of the value of exempted services under the rule. The appeal was allowed, and the Jurisdictional Authorities were directed to verify the credit reversals. en-us Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Mar 2018 07:27:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356803 The Tribunal found that the appellant's actions, including reversing credit on common input services and paying full duty liability, complied with Rule 6 (3) (i) requirements for the period 2009-2010 to 2013-2014. The Tribunal held that the appellant should not be required to pay 5% of the value of exempted services under the rule. The appeal was allowed, and the Jurisdictional Authorities were directed to verify the credit reversals. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356803