<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 494 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356791</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order directing denovo consideration and permitting cross-examination of witnesses in a case involving central excise duty evasion by cement manufacturers. Emphasizing the importance of cross-examination to prevent prejudice, the Tribunal cited previous Tribunal decisions and rulings from High Courts of Kerala and Delhi. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order was dismissed, with the Tribunal affirming the necessity of cross-examination for a fair process. The matter was disposed of accordingly, with the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the respondent&#039;s cross-objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 07:27:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 494 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356791</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order directing denovo consideration and permitting cross-examination of witnesses in a case involving central excise duty evasion by cement manufacturers. Emphasizing the importance of cross-examination to prevent prejudice, the Tribunal cited previous Tribunal decisions and rulings from High Courts of Kerala and Delhi. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the order was dismissed, with the Tribunal affirming the necessity of cross-examination for a fair process. The matter was disposed of accordingly, with the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the respondent&#039;s cross-objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>