<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 493 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356790</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter for a fresh determination of credit eligibility on various input services disallowed by the adjudicating authority. The decision emphasized the necessity of verifying the nexus between the services and manufacturing activity, particularly concerning services billed to the Input Service Distributor (ISD). The Tribunal directed a reassessment based on specific invoices and the exclusion part of the &#039;input services&#039; definition post a 2011 amendment, leaving all issues open for reconsideration. This outcome favored the appellant pending further review by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 07:27:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 493 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356790</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter for a fresh determination of credit eligibility on various input services disallowed by the adjudicating authority. The decision emphasized the necessity of verifying the nexus between the services and manufacturing activity, particularly concerning services billed to the Input Service Distributor (ISD). The Tribunal directed a reassessment based on specific invoices and the exclusion part of the &#039;input services&#039; definition post a 2011 amendment, leaving all issues open for reconsideration. This outcome favored the appellant pending further review by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>