<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 492 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356789</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of credit for the Award Scheme Event but deemed Event Management Services eligible as input services. The matter was remanded to the original authority for verification based on newly produced documents. Penalties imposed were set aside due to the lack of malicious intent in availing the credits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 07:27:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 492 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356789</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of credit for the Award Scheme Event but deemed Event Management Services eligible as input services. The matter was remanded to the original authority for verification based on newly produced documents. Penalties imposed were set aside due to the lack of malicious intent in availing the credits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>