https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199775 An appeal against a consent decree is barred where the decree was passed with the consent of parties, and the proper remedy for challenging the compromise lies before the court that recorded it. A compromise recorded in writing and signed through duly authorized counsel satisfies Order 23 Rule 3, including where the agreement promises future vacation of premises and creates an executable decree. The court treated counsel acting under vakalatnama as competent to bind the party for compromise. The consent decree was therefore upheld as lawful, and the respondents remained entitled to pursue mesne profits until delivery of possession in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:29:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199775 An appeal against a consent decree is barred where the decree was passed with the consent of parties, and the proper remedy for challenging the compromise lies before the court that recorded it. A compromise recorded in writing and signed through duly authorized counsel satisfies Order 23 Rule 3, including where the agreement promises future vacation of premises and creates an executable decree. The court treated counsel acting under vakalatnama as competent to bind the party for compromise. The consent decree was therefore upheld as lawful, and the respondents remained entitled to pursue mesne profits until delivery of possession in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199775