<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 17 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12216</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the garnishee notice issued by Revenue authorities, ruling that the petitioners must pay the specified amount towards tax arrears. The court emphasized the petitioners&#039; obligation to make the payment while occupying the premises, highlighting legal principles on tax recovery and contractual obligations. The decision underscored the importance of timely and well-supported legal actions in such disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 17 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12216</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the garnishee notice issued by Revenue authorities, ruling that the petitioners must pay the specified amount towards tax arrears. The court emphasized the petitioners&#039; obligation to make the payment while occupying the premises, highlighting legal principles on tax recovery and contractual obligations. The decision underscored the importance of timely and well-supported legal actions in such disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>