https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199773 In custody disputes between major parents, a consent arrangement may be upheld if the Court is satisfied that it serves the welfare of the minor. The compromise is not invalid merely because no separate express sanction was recorded in the manner contemplated by Order XXXII, Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. A custody order is not an order in rem and remains subject to variation if circumstances change. Once the Court passes an order in terms of signed consent terms, it can be set aside only on grounds that would invalidate the compromise itself. en-us Thu, 01 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Mar 2018 16:37:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199773 In custody disputes between major parents, a consent arrangement may be upheld if the Court is satisfied that it serves the welfare of the minor. The compromise is not invalid merely because no separate express sanction was recorded in the manner contemplated by Order XXXII, Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. A custody order is not an order in rem and remains subject to variation if circumstances change. Once the Court passes an order in terms of signed consent terms, it can be set aside only on grounds that would invalidate the compromise itself. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199773