https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199772 The court accepted the defendant's apology for failing to comply with the sanctioned plan in a contempt application regarding pillars and a window as per a consent decree. The defendant undertook to build the pillars according to the plan, and the court directed the plaintiff to pay the costs of the application. Emphasizing the importance of upholding court authority, the court granted another chance for compliance with the sanctioned plan despite the plaintiff's arguments. The court also addressed the dispute over the existence of a window in the alternative accommodation room, highlighting the need to adhere to all aspects of the consent decree unless otherwise agreed upon. en-us Mon, 02 Apr 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Mar 2018 16:32:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199772 The court accepted the defendant's apology for failing to comply with the sanctioned plan in a contempt application regarding pillars and a window as per a consent decree. The defendant undertook to build the pillars according to the plan, and the court directed the plaintiff to pay the costs of the application. Emphasizing the importance of upholding court authority, the court granted another chance for compliance with the sanctioned plan despite the plaintiff's arguments. The court also addressed the dispute over the existence of a window in the alternative accommodation room, highlighting the need to adhere to all aspects of the consent decree unless otherwise agreed upon. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 02 Apr 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199772