<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (9) TMI 419 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199762</link>
    <description>A scheme of amalgamation may be sanctioned where statutory meetings are properly convened, the explanatory statement is disclosed with notice, and the required classes approve the proposal overwhelmingly. Allegations of non-disclosure, proxy irregularity or fraud must be supported by the record; absent such proof, they do not defeat the scheme. Share valuation may be upheld if it is reasonable in light of market quotation, asset-liability position and revival prospects. A revival-oriented amalgamation is not objectionable merely because it assists a loss-making unit, provided the scheme is not unfair, fraudulent or oppressive. Dividend and employee-related objections were also treated as unfounded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 12:49:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (9) TMI 419 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199762</link>
      <description>A scheme of amalgamation may be sanctioned where statutory meetings are properly convened, the explanatory statement is disclosed with notice, and the required classes approve the proposal overwhelmingly. Allegations of non-disclosure, proxy irregularity or fraud must be supported by the record; absent such proof, they do not defeat the scheme. Share valuation may be upheld if it is reasonable in light of market quotation, asset-liability position and revival prospects. A revival-oriented amalgamation is not objectionable merely because it assists a loss-making unit, provided the scheme is not unfair, fraudulent or oppressive. Dividend and employee-related objections were also treated as unfounded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>