<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (8) TMI 82 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199758</link>
    <description>An agreement over mining assets may cross from an interim working arrangement into a prohibited transfer where it gives exclusive possession, control of collieries, and authority to work, raise, and sell minerals, even if formal lease execution and government approval were contemplated. On that analysis, the document was treated as infringing statutory restrictions on transfer of mining rights to the extent it conferred an interest in the mines, though it was not characterised as a wholly void present demise. A perfected consent order, once acted upon and relied on, was not recalled or set aside; the court instead preserved controlled operation and directed supervised management of the assets pending lawful permission and further orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:48:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (8) TMI 82 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199758</link>
      <description>An agreement over mining assets may cross from an interim working arrangement into a prohibited transfer where it gives exclusive possession, control of collieries, and authority to work, raise, and sell minerals, even if formal lease execution and government approval were contemplated. On that analysis, the document was treated as infringing statutory restrictions on transfer of mining rights to the extent it conferred an interest in the mines, though it was not characterised as a wholly void present demise. A perfected consent order, once acted upon and relied on, was not recalled or set aside; the court instead preserved controlled operation and directed supervised management of the assets pending lawful permission and further orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>