<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (2) TMI 96 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT (FB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199757</link>
    <description>The Tribunal under the Displaced Persons (Debts Adjustment) Act, 1951 was treated as a civil court for purposes of the Code of Civil Procedure because it was composed of specified civil courts, decided civil disputes, followed the Code in its procedure, and its decrees were executable through the civil court framework. On that basis, it was held to be subordinate to the High Court for Section 115 purposes, so revision lay against its orders. A dissent viewed the Tribunal as a distinct statutory forum outside revisional jurisdiction under Section 115.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:43:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (2) TMI 96 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT (FB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199757</link>
      <description>The Tribunal under the Displaced Persons (Debts Adjustment) Act, 1951 was treated as a civil court for purposes of the Code of Civil Procedure because it was composed of specified civil courts, decided civil disputes, followed the Code in its procedure, and its decrees were executable through the civil court framework. On that basis, it was held to be subordinate to the High Court for Section 115 purposes, so revision lay against its orders. A dissent viewed the Tribunal as a distinct statutory forum outside revisional jurisdiction under Section 115.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>