<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1942 (8) TMI 11 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199753</link>
    <description>Statutory by-laws framed under the Bombay Cotton Contracts Act, 1932 were treated as governing the arbitration scheme and, under the saving provision in the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940, could validly permit the chairman to extend time for making the award. A reference made on the day after the contractual period expired on a Sunday was held within time, so the limitation objection failed. The arbitration agreement was also held to survive a party&#039;s death, allowing the legal representative to proceed, and the court would not disturb the award absent illegality on its face. The challenge to the award therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 1942 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:00:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1942 (8) TMI 11 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199753</link>
      <description>Statutory by-laws framed under the Bombay Cotton Contracts Act, 1932 were treated as governing the arbitration scheme and, under the saving provision in the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940, could validly permit the chairman to extend time for making the award. A reference made on the day after the contractual period expired on a Sunday was held within time, so the limitation objection failed. The arbitration agreement was also held to survive a party&#039;s death, allowing the legal representative to proceed, and the court would not disturb the award absent illegality on its face. The challenge to the award therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 1942 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>