<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 483 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356780</link>
    <description>Duty-paid defective corrugated boxes returned to the factory for remaking, refinement or reconditioning qualify for Cenvat credit under Rule 16. Credit cannot be denied merely because the returned stock remains in the factory, since the duty liability on such goods arises only when they are removed after processing, not while they are still held in stock. The commentary notes that the appellate authority had accepted the availability of credit in principle and erred in disallowing it only on the ground of continued factory storage. The denial of credit was therefore incorrect, and credit was admissible on the returned goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 06:57:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 483 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356780</link>
      <description>Duty-paid defective corrugated boxes returned to the factory for remaking, refinement or reconditioning qualify for Cenvat credit under Rule 16. Credit cannot be denied merely because the returned stock remains in the factory, since the duty liability on such goods arises only when they are removed after processing, not while they are still held in stock. The commentary notes that the appellate authority had accepted the availability of credit in principle and erred in disallowing it only on the ground of continued factory storage. The denial of credit was therefore incorrect, and credit was admissible on the returned goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>