<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 477 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356774</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, concluding that the assessee had not established a permanent establishment to trigger Section 9 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the evidence did not show the assessee&#039;s Liaison Offices in India engaged in substantial business activities. The Court noted the consistency in previous decisions and found the ITAT&#039;s reasoning to be reasonable, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2018 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 477 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356774</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, concluding that the assessee had not established a permanent establishment to trigger Section 9 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the evidence did not show the assessee&#039;s Liaison Offices in India engaged in substantial business activities. The Court noted the consistency in previous decisions and found the ITAT&#039;s reasoning to be reasonable, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>