<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 439 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356736</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging duty demand confirmation and predeposit order was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal due to the Appellant&#039;s failure to comply with the predeposit requirement. The Tribunal rejected the Appellant&#039;s modification applications citing financial hardship, as insufficient evidence was provided to support the claim. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, finding no substantial question of law and no valid reason for non-compliance with the predeposit order. The appeal was dismissed without costs to either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2018 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 439 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356736</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging duty demand confirmation and predeposit order was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal due to the Appellant&#039;s failure to comply with the predeposit requirement. The Tribunal rejected the Appellant&#039;s modification applications citing financial hardship, as insufficient evidence was provided to support the claim. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, finding no substantial question of law and no valid reason for non-compliance with the predeposit order. The appeal was dismissed without costs to either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>