<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 76 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12200</link>
    <description>A declaration throwing royalty rights into a Hindu undivided family hotchpot vested the family with the right to receive royalties, including those from a second edition published by another publisher, because the entitlement attached to the authorship and contents of the book rather than to a particular edition. Expenditure on the revised edition was deductible to the extent the Commissioner had already allowed, since that quantification was not shown to be erroneous. The karta&#039;s foreign travel for an international seminar connected with the book was also not disallowable on the basis of the Hindu Gains of Learning Act, 1930, because that Act did not prevent voluntary treatment of the fruits of learning as family assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 76 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12200</link>
      <description>A declaration throwing royalty rights into a Hindu undivided family hotchpot vested the family with the right to receive royalties, including those from a second edition published by another publisher, because the entitlement attached to the authorship and contents of the book rather than to a particular edition. Expenditure on the revised edition was deductible to the extent the Commissioner had already allowed, since that quantification was not shown to be erroneous. The karta&#039;s foreign travel for an international seminar connected with the book was also not disallowable on the basis of the Hindu Gains of Learning Act, 1930, because that Act did not prevent voluntary treatment of the fruits of learning as family assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>