<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 419 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356716</link>
    <description>Attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act could not be continued once the appellants were acquitted in the predicate offences and in the prosecution under the money-laundering charges. Because the acquittals included the case forming the basis of the attachment, the foundation for the restraint on the properties no longer survived. The tribunal accordingly set aside the continued attachment and directed release of the attached properties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2018 06:56:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 419 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356716</link>
      <description>Attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act could not be continued once the appellants were acquitted in the predicate offences and in the prosecution under the money-laundering charges. Because the acquittals included the case forming the basis of the attachment, the foundation for the restraint on the properties no longer survived. The tribunal accordingly set aside the continued attachment and directed release of the attached properties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>