<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 418 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356715</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that providing cabs to travel agents for foreign tourists constituted renting of vehicles falling under the definition of rent-a-cab service. The demand for service tax on the appellant was deemed unsustainable. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with any consequential relief. The decision focused on interpreting the definition of rent-a-cab service and distinguishing between renting and hiring vehicles to determine tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 418 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356715</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that providing cabs to travel agents for foreign tourists constituted renting of vehicles falling under the definition of rent-a-cab service. The demand for service tax on the appellant was deemed unsustainable. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with any consequential relief. The decision focused on interpreting the definition of rent-a-cab service and distinguishing between renting and hiring vehicles to determine tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>