https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356713 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the authorized dealer, stating that if the manufacturer had discharged the service tax liability on the commission received from financial institutions, the dealer should not be held liable for further tax. The Tribunal emphasized the principle of revenue neutrality and cited previous cases to support its decision. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential benefits, if any. en-us Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Mar 2018 06:56:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356713 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the authorized dealer, stating that if the manufacturer had discharged the service tax liability on the commission received from financial institutions, the dealer should not be held liable for further tax. The Tribunal emphasized the principle of revenue neutrality and cited previous cases to support its decision. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential benefits, if any. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356713