<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 412 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356709</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the demand and penalties related to the service tax on &#039;Supply of Tangible Goods&#039;, ruling that the appellants did not fall under this category as they had transferred both possession and effective control of the equipment. The disallowance of credit on input services was partially upheld, with credit allowed for most services except club services. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, providing relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2018 06:56:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 412 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356709</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the demand and penalties related to the service tax on &#039;Supply of Tangible Goods&#039;, ruling that the appellants did not fall under this category as they had transferred both possession and effective control of the equipment. The disallowance of credit on input services was partially upheld, with credit allowed for most services except club services. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, providing relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>