https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356703 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that spent solvents, after purification and distillation, are not excisable goods and therefore not liable for excise duty. Citing precedents from the High Court of Andhra Pradesh and the Supreme Court, the Tribunal emphasized that the law established the non-excisability of spent solvents. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Revenue's demands and allowed the appeals, affirming that the Revenue's claims lacked merit. en-us Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Mar 2018 06:55:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356703 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that spent solvents, after purification and distillation, are not excisable goods and therefore not liable for excise duty. Citing precedents from the High Court of Andhra Pradesh and the Supreme Court, the Tribunal emphasized that the law established the non-excisability of spent solvents. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Revenue's demands and allowed the appeals, affirming that the Revenue's claims lacked merit. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356703