<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 403 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356700</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the impugned order by reducing the redemption fine to Rs. One lakh and the penalty to Rs. 50,000, disposing of the appeal partially in favor of the appellant. The decision aimed to strike a balance between penal consequences and mitigating circumstances, considering the appellant&#039;s constraints in maintaining daily stock accounts and the availability of excess stock within the factory premises.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2018 06:55:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 403 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356700</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the impugned order by reducing the redemption fine to Rs. One lakh and the penalty to Rs. 50,000, disposing of the appeal partially in favor of the appellant. The decision aimed to strike a balance between penal consequences and mitigating circumstances, considering the appellant&#039;s constraints in maintaining daily stock accounts and the availability of excess stock within the factory premises.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>