https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356699 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the matter for further proceedings due to the denial of cross-examination, which was deemed a violation of natural justice. The appellant, accused of wrongly passing on Cenvat credit, was penalized under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and emphasized the importance of providing the appellant with the opportunity for cross-examination in adjudicatory proceedings, citing violations of natural justice principles. en-us Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Mar 2018 06:55:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356699 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the matter for further proceedings due to the denial of cross-examination, which was deemed a violation of natural justice. The appellant, accused of wrongly passing on Cenvat credit, was penalized under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and emphasized the importance of providing the appellant with the opportunity for cross-examination in adjudicatory proceedings, citing violations of natural justice principles. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356699