https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199731 In serious foreign exchange offence investigations, anticipatory bail is not warranted merely because the accused asserts a medical condition; health concerns do not create immunity from arrest or interrogation, though the investigating agency must safeguard the detainee's health. The Court also held that it should not prescribe fixed pre-interrogation modalities, including mandatory reference to cardiologists, where such directions could impair effective investigation, and that the agency should retain operational freedom subject to appropriate medical precautions. The refusal of pre-arrest bail was upheld, the restrictive interrogation conditions were set aside, and the order of the Sessions Judge was restored with an extension for use of seized documents. en-us Thu, 08 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Apr 2022 16:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199731 In serious foreign exchange offence investigations, anticipatory bail is not warranted merely because the accused asserts a medical condition; health concerns do not create immunity from arrest or interrogation, though the investigating agency must safeguard the detainee's health. The Court also held that it should not prescribe fixed pre-interrogation modalities, including mandatory reference to cardiologists, where such directions could impair effective investigation, and that the agency should retain operational freedom subject to appropriate medical precautions. The refusal of pre-arrest bail was upheld, the restrictive interrogation conditions were set aside, and the order of the Sessions Judge was restored with an extension for use of seized documents. Case-Laws FEMA Thu, 08 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199731