https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199723 An unpaid seller who resells goods under Section 54(2) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 must prove notice to the buyer of the intended resale before claiming damages for the resale. A notice demanding delivery or payment, without warning that the goods will be resold, is insufficient, and a later notice stating that resale has already taken place does not cure the defect. The buyer's denial of the contract does not dispense with this statutory requirement. Where the seller retains possession of ascertained goods as unpaid seller's lien, the price of goods actually delivered remains recoverable with interest, but damages for goods resold without notice are not. en-us Mon, 02 Jan 1956 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Mar 2018 16:19:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199723 An unpaid seller who resells goods under Section 54(2) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 must prove notice to the buyer of the intended resale before claiming damages for the resale. A notice demanding delivery or payment, without warning that the goods will be resold, is insufficient, and a later notice stating that resale has already taken place does not cure the defect. The buyer's denial of the contract does not dispense with this statutory requirement. Where the seller retains possession of ascertained goods as unpaid seller's lien, the price of goods actually delivered remains recoverable with interest, but damages for goods resold without notice are not. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 02 Jan 1956 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199723