<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 683 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199721</link>
    <description>Prima facie consideration of a pre-deposit request under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act led to partial relief, as the Tribunal noted that the exemption and duty-liability dispute had already been addressed in an earlier order and that a substantial part of the demand appeared relatable to credit on single yarn. Complete waiver was therefore refused, but the pre-deposit requirement was reduced to a limited amount. On compliance with the directed deposit, the balance deposit obligation was waived and recovery was stayed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 16:13:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 683 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199721</link>
      <description>Prima facie consideration of a pre-deposit request under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act led to partial relief, as the Tribunal noted that the exemption and duty-liability dispute had already been addressed in an earlier order and that a substantial part of the demand appeared relatable to credit on single yarn. Complete waiver was therefore refused, but the pre-deposit requirement was reduced to a limited amount. On compliance with the directed deposit, the balance deposit obligation was waived and recovery was stayed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>