https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199715 Non-compliance with the mandatory inquiry under Section 32G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act can render a declaration that a tenant's purchase is ineffective invalid, especially where the tenant had earlier appeared, the authority acted mechanically on a single absence, and the proviso requiring communication and an opportunity for review was not shown to have been satisfied. A consequential order under Section 32P cannot stand without a valid foundation under Section 32G, and failure to address the statutory refund requirement further undermines its legality. The stated result is quashing of the impugned orders and remand for a fresh inquiry from the stage of recording the tenant's statement. en-us Tue, 26 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Mar 2018 15:44:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199715 Non-compliance with the mandatory inquiry under Section 32G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act can render a declaration that a tenant's purchase is ineffective invalid, especially where the tenant had earlier appeared, the authority acted mechanically on a single absence, and the proviso requiring communication and an opportunity for review was not shown to have been satisfied. A consequential order under Section 32P cannot stand without a valid foundation under Section 32G, and failure to address the statutory refund requirement further undermines its legality. The stated result is quashing of the impugned orders and remand for a fresh inquiry from the stage of recording the tenant's statement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199715