<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (4) TMI 30 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199707</link>
    <description>The construction of the word &quot;action&quot; in an insurance policy was central: it was not confined to the narrower term &quot;suit&quot; and was given its ordinary legal meaning as a proceeding in a court of justice. Applying that meaning, an application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 for filing the arbitration agreement was treated as an &quot;action&quot; within the policy. The court therefore held that such proceedings constituted a pending action within the stipulated period and could preserve the claim against the policy time-bar. The objection under Clause 19 accordingly failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 15:12:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (4) TMI 30 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199707</link>
      <description>The construction of the word &quot;action&quot; in an insurance policy was central: it was not confined to the narrower term &quot;suit&quot; and was given its ordinary legal meaning as a proceeding in a court of justice. Applying that meaning, an application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 for filing the arbitration agreement was treated as an &quot;action&quot; within the policy. The court therefore held that such proceedings constituted a pending action within the stipulated period and could preserve the claim against the policy time-bar. The objection under Clause 19 accordingly failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>