https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199704 A tenancy termination notice was held valid and duly served because the plaint specifically pleaded service by registered post with postal receipt and acknowledgment, while the written statement did not specifically deny service and only asserted that the notice was not in accordance with law. That omission was treated as an implied admission under Order 8 Rule 5 CPC. The concurrent findings that the notice satisfied the requirements of Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Section 11 of the Assam Non-Agricultural Urban Areas Tenancy Act, 1955 were therefore sustainable, and the High Court should not have disturbed them. en-us Tue, 17 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199704 A tenancy termination notice was held valid and duly served because the plaint specifically pleaded service by registered post with postal receipt and acknowledgment, while the written statement did not specifically deny service and only asserted that the notice was not in accordance with law. That omission was treated as an implied admission under Order 8 Rule 5 CPC. The concurrent findings that the notice satisfied the requirements of Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Section 11 of the Assam Non-Agricultural Urban Areas Tenancy Act, 1955 were therefore sustainable, and the High Court should not have disturbed them. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199704