https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199702 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that co-heirs were entitled to their respective shares in properties post the abolition of Inams. The court ruled that the rule of primogeniture no longer applied, emphasizing the application of Shariat Law in property devolution. The claim of adverse possession over a dwelling unit was rejected due to insufficient evidence, with the court underscoring the need for specific pleadings. The judgment highlighted the uniform application of legal principles regardless of religious affiliation, asserting equal treatment for all subjects. No costs were awarded in the case. en-us Wed, 30 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199702 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that co-heirs were entitled to their respective shares in properties post the abolition of Inams. The court ruled that the rule of primogeniture no longer applied, emphasizing the application of Shariat Law in property devolution. The claim of adverse possession over a dwelling unit was rejected due to insufficient evidence, with the court underscoring the need for specific pleadings. The judgment highlighted the uniform application of legal principles regardless of religious affiliation, asserting equal treatment for all subjects. No costs were awarded in the case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199702