<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (8) TMI 91 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199701</link>
    <description>An ambiguous partnership arbitration clause may not justify a stay of a civil suit under Section 34 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 where it is unclear whether post-cessation or dissolution disputes fall within arbitration. The Court treated the dissolution controversy, including a request for dissolution on just and equitable grounds, as suitable for determination in the suit itself. It also considered the strained relationship between the partners and the risk of a later jurisdictional challenge to any award. On that basis, the stay application was refused and the suit was permitted to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 14:33:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (8) TMI 91 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199701</link>
      <description>An ambiguous partnership arbitration clause may not justify a stay of a civil suit under Section 34 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 where it is unclear whether post-cessation or dissolution disputes fall within arbitration. The Court treated the dissolution controversy, including a request for dissolution on just and equitable grounds, as suitable for determination in the suit itself. It also considered the strained relationship between the partners and the risk of a later jurisdictional challenge to any award. On that basis, the stay application was refused and the suit was permitted to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>