https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199700 A valid arbitration agreement required a civil suit to be stayed under Section 34 where the dispute in the suit substantially overlapped with matters already referred to arbitration. The prior setting aside of the award did not automatically terminate the reference because the reference had not been superseded. As the subject-matter fell within the arbitration clause and no sufficient reason existed to refuse reference to the chosen forum, stay ought to have been granted. The refusal of stay was therefore erroneous, and the parties were directed to pursue the dispute in arbitration rather than in the civil suit. en-us Tue, 25 Jun 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Mar 2018 14:32:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199700 A valid arbitration agreement required a civil suit to be stayed under Section 34 where the dispute in the suit substantially overlapped with matters already referred to arbitration. The prior setting aside of the award did not automatically terminate the reference because the reference had not been superseded. As the subject-matter fell within the arbitration clause and no sufficient reason existed to refuse reference to the chosen forum, stay ought to have been granted. The refusal of stay was therefore erroneous, and the parties were directed to pursue the dispute in arbitration rather than in the civil suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Jun 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199700