https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199688 A deceased person's statement that he was going to meet a particular person at the accused's house was admissible as a circumstance of the transaction under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act because it was closely connected with the death in issue. A statement made by a person to police during investigation was held barred by Section 162 of the Code of Criminal Procedure even if that person later became the accused, and the court declined to read in any exception. Exclusion of that statement did not vitiate the conviction because independent evidence remained sufficient and no failure of justice was shown. en-us Fri, 20 Jan 1939 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:22:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199688 A deceased person's statement that he was going to meet a particular person at the accused's house was admissible as a circumstance of the transaction under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act because it was closely connected with the death in issue. A statement made by a person to police during investigation was held barred by Section 162 of the Code of Criminal Procedure even if that person later became the accused, and the court declined to read in any exception. Exclusion of that statement did not vitiate the conviction because independent evidence remained sufficient and no failure of justice was shown. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Jan 1939 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199688