<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 633 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199685</link>
    <description>An appellate court may consider the effect of an interlocutory amendment on the final decree where it affects the merits, and contemporaneous documents can prevail over a later inconsistent pleading on construction-cost adjustment. The tenancy dispute turned on pleaded and proved facts: the termination notice was upheld, the civil court&#039;s jurisdiction objection was rejected for want of clear pleadings and proof, and the eviction claim was treated as maintainable. The tenant&#039;s right to recover construction cost was supported by receipts and acknowledgments, but the claimed interest was moderated. Arrears of rent were sustained, the deposit was refundable, and mesne profits were restricted to amounts proved on evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:07:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 633 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199685</link>
      <description>An appellate court may consider the effect of an interlocutory amendment on the final decree where it affects the merits, and contemporaneous documents can prevail over a later inconsistent pleading on construction-cost adjustment. The tenancy dispute turned on pleaded and proved facts: the termination notice was upheld, the civil court&#039;s jurisdiction objection was rejected for want of clear pleadings and proof, and the eviction claim was treated as maintainable. The tenant&#039;s right to recover construction cost was supported by receipts and acknowledgments, but the claimed interest was moderated. Arrears of rent were sustained, the deposit was refundable, and mesne profits were restricted to amounts proved on evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>