<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (3) TMI 84 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199684</link>
    <description>Bonus awarded by an Industrial Court, where it is not payable under the terms of employment, does not fall within the unamended definition of &quot;wages&quot; under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936. The Court construed &quot;wages&quot; as remuneration payable only when the contract of employment, express or implied, is fulfilled, and held that a bonus created by industrial adjudication is not contractual remuneration. On that basis, the Authority under section 15 had no jurisdiction to entertain claims for such bonus.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 13:04:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (3) TMI 84 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199684</link>
      <description>Bonus awarded by an Industrial Court, where it is not payable under the terms of employment, does not fall within the unamended definition of &quot;wages&quot; under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936. The Court construed &quot;wages&quot; as remuneration payable only when the contract of employment, express or implied, is fulfilled, and held that a bonus created by industrial adjudication is not contractual remuneration. On that basis, the Authority under section 15 had no jurisdiction to entertain claims for such bonus.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>