<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 548 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199680</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the plaintiff&#039;s suit for specific performance of an oral agreement of sale due to insufficient and unreliable evidence. The court also denied the permanent injunction sought by the plaintiff, ruling that there was no valid and enforceable contract. The 7th defendant&#039;s suit for recovery of possession and damages was decreed, allowing the defendant to take possession of the vacant site. The court questioned the plaintiff&#039;s financial capacity and found the alleged oral agreement lacked validity and enforceability. The lower court&#039;s judgment was set aside, with no costs awarded in the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 12:53:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 548 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199680</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the plaintiff&#039;s suit for specific performance of an oral agreement of sale due to insufficient and unreliable evidence. The court also denied the permanent injunction sought by the plaintiff, ruling that there was no valid and enforceable contract. The 7th defendant&#039;s suit for recovery of possession and damages was decreed, allowing the defendant to take possession of the vacant site. The court questioned the plaintiff&#039;s financial capacity and found the alleged oral agreement lacked validity and enforceability. The lower court&#039;s judgment was set aside, with no costs awarded in the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>