<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (1) TMI 405 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199674</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under section 32AB of the Income-tax Act for income classified as agricultural income was upheld. The Tribunal considered income from the sale of Eucalyptus wood as agricultural income exempt from tax but part of business profit, emphasizing that income earned from agricultural operations on leased land constituted agricultural income eligible for deduction. The Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of &#039;eligible business&#039; allowed for adjustments in income computation, affirming that the petitioner was entitled to the benefit of section 32AB due to compliance with relevant provisions and interconnected nature of business activities. The petition for reference to the High Court was dismissed based on established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 12:09:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (1) TMI 405 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199674</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under section 32AB of the Income-tax Act for income classified as agricultural income was upheld. The Tribunal considered income from the sale of Eucalyptus wood as agricultural income exempt from tax but part of business profit, emphasizing that income earned from agricultural operations on leased land constituted agricultural income eligible for deduction. The Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of &#039;eligible business&#039; allowed for adjustments in income computation, affirming that the petitioner was entitled to the benefit of section 32AB due to compliance with relevant provisions and interconnected nature of business activities. The petition for reference to the High Court was dismissed based on established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>