https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199672 The Bombay Relief Undertakings (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 was upheld as a valid exercise of State legislative power because its dominant purpose was temporary industrial relief and unemployment prevention, with only incidental overlap into other fields. Sections 3 and 4 were also sustained against challenge under article 14 since the Act disclosed a clear policy, supplied sufficient guidance, and created a rational classification for State-aided or State-controlled undertakings. Section 4's temporary suspension of enforcement of rights was held to be a reasonable restriction in public interest and not an unconstitutional deprivation of property rights under article 19(1)(f). The notifications issued under sections 3 and 4 were likewise held valid, as no non-application of mind was shown. en-us Wed, 30 Sep 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Mar 2018 12:05:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199672 The Bombay Relief Undertakings (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 was upheld as a valid exercise of State legislative power because its dominant purpose was temporary industrial relief and unemployment prevention, with only incidental overlap into other fields. Sections 3 and 4 were also sustained against challenge under article 14 since the Act disclosed a clear policy, supplied sufficient guidance, and created a rational classification for State-aided or State-controlled undertakings. Section 4's temporary suspension of enforcement of rights was held to be a reasonable restriction in public interest and not an unconstitutional deprivation of property rights under article 19(1)(f). The notifications issued under sections 3 and 4 were likewise held valid, as no non-application of mind was shown. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 30 Sep 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199672