<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 46 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12185</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The Court held that the sum claimed by the assessee as withheld by the Indian Railways for past damages and losses was an admissible deduction. The Court emphasized that the unrealized amount could not be considered as income, supporting the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 46 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12185</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The Court held that the sum claimed by the assessee as withheld by the Indian Railways for past damages and losses was an admissible deduction. The Court emphasized that the unrealized amount could not be considered as income, supporting the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>