https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199668 The interim arrangement was modified to permit recovery of dues where Section 11A notices had already been served, but recovery was confined to the six-month period covered by those notices. If service of notice was disputed, the Assistant Collector was to determine that issue. Where no notice had yet been issued, the respondents were permitted to issue notices, subject to the same six-month limit and without passing any recovery order unless the applicants were given an opportunity to make representations. The bank guarantees furnished by the applicants were also made available for realisation of dues, if any. en-us Thu, 28 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Mar 2018 11:05:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199668 The interim arrangement was modified to permit recovery of dues where Section 11A notices had already been served, but recovery was confined to the six-month period covered by those notices. If service of notice was disputed, the Assistant Collector was to determine that issue. Where no notice had yet been issued, the respondents were permitted to issue notices, subject to the same six-month limit and without passing any recovery order unless the applicants were given an opportunity to make representations. The bank guarantees furnished by the applicants were also made available for realisation of dues, if any. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 28 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199668